Fleet Holds

jedion357's picture
jedion357
October 30, 2013 - 11:48am
I've always considered a SY as good as a fleet since it can deploy the fleets and RS stations are considered a hold or claim on a territory but the recent round of potential hostility with the SEU and their insistance that a SY is not a fleet hold has me thinking that we should deploy at least one fighter along with a SY as a fleet hold for future claims disputes.

It would seem that the SEU has a very litteral interpretation of the phrase "fleet hold" to mean a fleet and not a station.
I might not be a dralasite, vrusk or yazirian but I do play one in Star Frontiers!
Comments:

iggy's picture
iggy
October 30, 2013 - 11:56am
Yes that would be wise.  Also I would use a ship and not a turret.  Have you had a new problem since mine?
-iggy

jedion357's picture
jedion357
October 30, 2013 - 2:05pm
No I was just thinking about it. Honestly I'm not holding any property at this minute so I guess the point is mute.
I might not be a dralasite, vrusk or yazirian but I do play one in Star Frontiers!