 December 5, 2008 - 9:59am | I know some people are already developing systems for Frontierspace, but should we not define how this should be set out? It keeps the process standardised; will speed up the process in making a system, and is easier for everyone to follow/ understand. |
 December 5, 2008 - 10:09am | ageed. Perhaps simply allow one or two developers get started, then after they toss their ideas back and forth (to each other), they can present the systems as the 'standard' for future developements. This avoids having any one developer having to 'redo' his work repeatedly to match the 'stardard' that comes to fruition over time. <insert witty comment here> |
 December 5, 2008 - 10:51am | I used Shadow Shack's template(modified to suit), found in the House Rules Wiki. "You're everything that's base in humanity," Cochrane continued. "Drawing up strict, senseless rules for the sole reason of putting you at the top and excluding anyone you say doesn't belong or fit in, for no other reason than just because you say so." —Judith and Garfield Reeves-Stephens, Federation |
